Swedish Military NOE Helicopter Bird Strike

During a night training flight using Night Vision Goggles (NVG), one of a pair of Swedish Armed Forces Agusta 109LUHs (known to the Swedish military as a Helicopter 15), 152-765, collided with a bird on 3 February 2017.

Bird Debris in the Swedish Military A109LUH / Helicopter 15 Cockpit (Credit: SHK)

Bird Debris in the Swedish Military A109LUH / Helicopter 15 Cockpit (Credit: SHK)

The bird went through the windshield and struck the student pilot resulting in serious facial injuries.  The instructor was able to take control and perform a safe landing.

The Accident Flight

The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK) has issued their report (in Swedish but with an English summary).  The training exercise near Sveg in Northern Sweden, involved Nap of the Earth (NOE) flight as low as 20ft.  The area had been used for exercises for 7 years, with ‘Recognized Exercise Paths’ established. The aircraft was at around 35ft and 100 knots when it hit a Western Capercaillie (otherwise known as a Wood Grouse) with an estimated weight between 3.6 and 4.8 kg.

A Stuffed Western Capercaillie  / Wood Grouse (Credit: SHK)

A Stuffed Western Capercaillie / Wood Grouse (Credit: SHK)

There are about 700,000 of these in Sweden, with a greater propensity in the north of the country. They most active during dawn and dusk but do take to the air at night when scared.

The bird went through the right hand windshield.  The student’s helmet was split, their NVGs knocked off and the student’s spectacles broken.  The right hand pilot’s door upper and lower locks were also damaged.  The instructor landed at a site where the second helicopter could recovery the injured pilot.  The investigators believe the pilot’s spectacles may have provided some extra protection form the bird debris and NVGs.

A109LU Student Pilot's Helmet (Credit: SHK)

A109LU Student Pilot’s Helmet (Credit: SHK)

A risk analysis had been carried out before the exercise using an Operational Risk Management Method (ORM) tool, with 17 different hazards identified.  Although bird strike was considered the only mitigations were post-impact recovery measures.  Similarly SAR helicopter cover was a mitigation to a number of accident scenarios but there was minimal change to the exercise when it was known the cloud base was too low for Swedish Maritime Administration Leonardo AW139 SAR cover.

The investigators do accept that:

[The probability of] collision with such large birds may generally be considered to be low. However, there are several parameters that affect the probability, such as the area of ​​the flight, the time, the flight altitude and the speed.

Certification Requirements

A109LUH / Helicopter 15 (Credit: FMV)

The A109 was certified according to JAR-27.  This required the windscreen resist aerodynamic forces that occur during flight up to maximum speed with a sufficient safety margin and it does not fragment into small debris when damaged.  There is no specific requirement on bird strike resistance even in current EASA CS-27 / FAA FAR-27. The operating unit were not aware of this.

Part 29, for civil rotorcraft over 3,175 kg  does now have a 1 kg bird strike requirement at maximum speed up to 8,000ft.  The NH90 (Helicopter 14) can withstand a collision with a bird weighing 1 kg up to 300 km/h.  The Sikorsky UH-60M Black Hawk (Helicopter 16) can withstand a 1.8 kg at the maximum speed up to c5,000ft report the SHK.

SHK Safety Analysis and Conclusions

The investigators say:

It is clear from the investigation that the risk analysis performed before the training only took into account the risk of bird strike to a limited extent, and that there was a lack of knowledge regarding helicopter 15’s certification requirements with regard to bird strikes.

The accident was a result of the exercise not being sufficiently adapted in terms of altitude and speed on account of the incidence of grouse in the area.

A contributing factor was weaknesses in the risk analysis, where knowledge of Helicopter 15’s limited capacity to sustain a bird strike was lacking.

Additionally it was noted by investigators that before the exercise that it was known that there was no SAR helicopter cover during the exercise due to poor weather.

Safety Actions

Routings have been changed to be closer to Sveg and favour low flying over plateaus rather than in valleys where capercaillie nest.  Speed has been reduced to <80 knots, bank angle reduced to <20° (as sudden banking creates sudden noise increases at ground level that alarm nesting birds) and the first flight along a route being at no lower than 65ft.

Safety Recommendations

The Swedish Armed Forces is recommended to:

  1. Develop the risk analyses concerning tactical requirements and low-level flight in helicopter operations, taking into account the helicopter’s capacity to sustain a bird strike as well as the incidence and behaviour of birdlife. (RM 2018:01 R1)
  2. Ensure that access to airborne search and rescue standby corresponds to the requirements established in the risk analysis. (RM 2018:01 R2)

A109LUH / Helicopter 15 In-Flight (Credit: FMV)

Safety Resources

We have previously written:

Aerossurance has extensive air safety, operations, airworthiness, human factors, aviation regulation and safety analysis experience.  For practical aviation advice you can trust, contact us at: enquiries@aerossurance.com