Machining Defect Cause of V2500 Failure
The flightcrew shutdown the No. 2 engine, discharged both fire bottles, and performed an air turnback to Long Beach. The airplane made a successful and uneventful single-engine landing…
Examination of the outside of the engine revealed a fractured fuel pressure line…and evidence of thermal distress such as consumed, partially-consumed or oxidized insulation blankets, loop clamps cushions, wiring harness sheathing, and sooting of various components and cases.
The investigation concluded the fuel pipe had failed due to excessive vibration. A full engine strip was necessary to identify the cause.
…a single fir tree blade retaining lug from the high pressure turbine stage 2 disk had fractured and 2 HPT stage 2 blades had released.
Metallurgical examination…revealed evidence of fatigue from multiple origins that propagated from the pressure side (PS) of the middle (No. 2) fillet towards the suction side (SS) almost through the entire width of the lug before finally fracturing due to progressive tensile overload.
Closer examination of the fractured lug revealed a concave ‘divot’ in the PS No. 2 fillet, immediately adjacent to the fracture surface. The depth of the ‘divot’ measured up to 0.0008 inches at the fracture origin site and the ‘divot’ was confirmed to run the entire length of the fillet.
Visual examination of all the other remaining lugs revealed that same ‘divot’ on PS No. 2 fillet and based on this IAE concluded that the groove appeared to be a tool mark resulting from the original machining (broach) operation.
The broaching tool is used to finish 3 discs, each with 72 slots, before re-sharpening (or ‘re-dressing’). The disc of the failed engine was the middle of three discs broached before the next re-sharpening. The other two discs were examined by IAE in March 2015. The first disc had 52 satisfactory slots but the last 20 exhibited the same ‘divot’ tool marks as found on the failed disc. All 72 slots on the third disc has tool marks.
In June 2015 IAE then went on to examine the first disc broached after the tool was next sharpened. All 72 slots exhibited the same tool marks as seen previously. Further unique tool marks were found on the PS No. 3 fillet.
The NTSB say:
Reconditioning of the broaching tool did not correct the ‘divot’ problem, so an audit team made up of IAE, Avio Aero (performed the finished machining/broaching operation), and General Electric (owner of Avio Aero) evaluated the entire manufacturing process with an emphasis on the broaching operation.
The evaluation of the Avio disk machining process revealed the following primary contributing factors:
1) cutter tool draft angle design leading to scuffing/sliding along the relief surfaces with associated side loading/deflection and rapid tool wear,
2) a non-optimized tool redressing process resulting in uneven material removal and non-uniform cutter tool profiles, and
3) procedural issues with inspection of tooling, set-up and final parts.
Based on these findings, the best practices from GE and IAE have been implemented to address these manufacturing deficiencies.
…IAE proposed a fleet management plan that would include the issuance of a Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB), anticipated in the first quarter of 2016, for a once-through the fleet inspection of all HPT stage 1 and 2 disks manufactured by Avio at the next engine HPT overhaul. According to IAE, Avio manufactured over 4,000 HPT stage 1 and 2 disks. Discussions with the Federal Aviation Administration [FAA] indicated that they intend to issue an Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandating the inspection of Avio manufactured V2500 HPT stage 1 and 2 disk based on the IAE NMSB.
UPDATE 5 April 2016: The FAA issues a Notice Of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to require inspecting the HPT stage 1 hub and HPT stage 2 hub, and, if necessary, their replacement with parts that are eligible for installation.
We have previously reported on another JetBlue A320 incident: What Leaks in Vegas Stays in Vegas – A320 Hydraulic Failure
A failure to latch the cowlings of a British Airways A319 (a known repeat problem on the type) prompted this article: A319 Double Cowling Loss and Fire – AAIB Report
Debris introduced during an engine overhaul cleaning operation resulted in this article: Micro FOD: Cessna 208B Grand Caravan Engine Failure & Forced Landing
UPDATE 12 September 2016: Uncontained CFM56-7 Failure: Southwest B737-700 27 August 2016
UPDATE 18 March 2018: USAF F-16C Crash: Engine Maintenance Error
UPDATE 15 September 2018: Eclipse 500 Landing Gear Production Defect
UPDATE 22 July 2020: NDI Process Failures Preceded B777 PW4077 Engine FBO
UPDATE 10 November 2020: King Air 100 Uncontained TPE331-6 Failure – Inappropriate Repair Scheme
UPDATE 17 September 2022: Canadian B212 Crash: A Defective Production Process