T-Bolt Trouble: Unrecorded Maintenance on US HEMS BK117C2/H145 and Loss of TR Pitch Control

T-Bolt Trouble: Unrecorded Maintenance on US HEMS BK117C2/H145 and Loss of Tail Rotor Pitch Control (Metro Aviation N191LL)

On 6 March 2024 Metro Aviation Airbus BK117C2 / H145 helicopter air ambulance N191LL was damaged at Purdue University Airport (LAF), West Lafayette, Indiana. The three occupants were uninjured.

Metro Aviation Airbus BK117C2 N191LL (Credit: via Redditt)

On 24 April 2025 the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released their safety investigation report, in a creditable 14 months.

The Accident Flight

The pilot reported that, while in a hover taxi to accelerate for takeoff, he felt a force against his feet from the pedals. The helicopter yawed to the right, so he applied full left pedal, but when the pedal was depressed, there was no resistance and no effect on the helicopter’s yaw.

The helicopter landed hard came to rest and rest upright, with damage to “the fuselage, tailboom, vertical fin, horizontal stabilizer, tail rotor assembly, and one main rotor blade”. 

The Safety Investigation – The Accident Sequence

The T-bolt and its attachment bolts, which connect the pitch change bellcrank to the pitch change slider was found to have become disconnected.

The installation of the BK117 T-bolt and associated attachment hardware onto the pitch change slider (Credit: Airbus / modified by NTSB).

Investigators concluded that the T-bolt attachment bolts had been installed but not torqued and lock wired, allowing them to back out while rotors running.

Once the attachment bolts backed out, the T-bolt also backed out resulting in a loss of tail rotor pitch control.

The T-bolt then likely impacted and damaged a tail rotor blade. The subsequent imbalance led to the overload separation of the upper vertical fin.  One attachment bolt was found on the ramp after the accident, and the other was “lodged into a honeycomb panel at the aft-lower area of the fuselage, adjacent to the fuel cell.”

The Safety Investigation – The Maintenance History

During maintenance a few days prior, the T-bolt and its attachment bolts were removed by a mechanic at the direction of a lead mechanic to facilitate troubleshooting of adjacent components for the tail rotor control system.

As the T-bolt’s removal was temporary and quick, the mechanic crucially choose not to record the removal in the Work Order’s Discrepancy Sheet. 

The T-bolt attachment bolts were then subsequently temporarily installed “finger-tight’ by a second mechanic to assist a third mechanic who was installing the tail rotor blade mounting forks and pitch change links.

According to the NTSB “the first mechanic [sic] was tasked to another company helicopter shortly after”.  The NTSB state that “while he stated he relayed to the other mechanics that the T-bolt attachment bolts were finger-tight, no one followed up on the installation of the T-bolt attachment bolts”. 

This part of the NTSB report is rather ambiguous but it seems likely the NTSB mean the mechanic tasked to another job was the second mechanic, who reinstalled the bolts finger tight, rather than the first mechanic who did the unrecorded removal.

Without a maintenance discrepancy entry for the removal of the T-bolt, there was no open task to verify T-bolt installation was complete.

Furthermore, no one identified that lock wire was missing from these bolts during the final checks before the helicopter was released to service.

NTSB Probable Cause

The failure of maintenance personnel to properly install the tail rotor pitch change slider attachment hardware (T-bolt), which led to the disconnection of the pitch change slider, a loss of tail rotor control, and subsequent hard landing.

Contributing to the accident was maintenance personnel’s failure to complete a maintenance discrepancy entry on the work order for the removal of the T-bolt.

Our Safety Observations

Disappointingly the maintenance human factors are not examined in any depth, no safety recommendations are made and no safety actions are recorded.  There is also no NTSB Public Docket released at this time where some depth of supporting evidence would have been expected.

The NTSB do highlight a 2015 safety alert: Mechanics Manage Risk and Follow Procedures (SA-022)

In November 2015 we wrote about a November 2013 accident where EC135P1 N911KB, crashed during a post-maintenance check flight at another Metro maintenance facility.  The NTSB determined the probable cause in that case to be:

The mechanic’s improper installation of the  antitorque pedalss, which resulted in an in-flight loss of helicopter control

Ironically in that article we wrote that:

The concept of a failure to learn has been raised in relation to BP after the 2005 Texas City refinery explosion, prior to the 2010 Macondo / Deepwater Horizon disaster.  It is also the subject of a book of the same title by Australian National University Emeritus Professor Andrew Hopkins and our own article on a Dutch refinery explosion (Shell Moerdijk Explosion: “Failure to Learn”).

We have also previously discussed Metro BK117C2 N263MH that had a hard landing after FOD due to loose airfield fencing.

Safety Resources

Aerossurance worked with the Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) to create a Maintenance Observation Program (MOP) requirement for their contractible BARSOHO offshore helicopter Safety Performance Requirements to help learning about routine maintenance and then to initiate safety improvements:

mop

Aerossurance can provide practice guidance and specialist support to successfully implement a MOP.   We have written several general articles related to maintenance safety:

You might find these safety / human factors resources of interest:

You may also find these Aerossurance articles of interest too:

We have previously looked at several accident which featured relevant maintenance human performance issues:

The European Safety Promotion Network Rotorcraft (ESPN-R) has a helicopter safety discussion group on LinkedIn


Aerossurance has extensive air safety, flight operations, HEMS, SAR, airworthiness, aviation maintenance, human factors, aviation regulation and safety analysis experience.  For practical aviation advice you can trust, contact us at: enquiries@aerossurance.com